Page 2 - Supreme Court Good Samaritan Statutory Force of GOI - 12 May 2015
        P. 2
     2
                    3.     The Department of Road Transport is responsible for framing motor
                    vehicle legislation and evolving road safety standards in India.  The WHO in
                    its ‘World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention, 2004’ has projected that
                    by 2020, road accidents will be one of the biggest killers in India.   It also
                    emphasized that in low income countries, the most common desisting factor
                    restraining the public from coming forward to help victims, is the apparent fear
                    of being involved in police cases.  There is need to build confidence amongst
                    the public to help road accident victims.  Bystanders should not be insisted to
                    divulge their personal particulars or detained in the hospital for interrogation.
                    People are hesitant to render immediate help to the road accident victims.  The
                    victims lay wounded on the road for some time till the arrival of police.  Delay
                    rendering medical help in such cases sometimes is fatal.   Good Samaritans
                    have the fear of legal consequences, involvement in litigation and repeated
                    visits to police station.  There is urgent need to tackle these issues.  There is
                    need to establish legal framework so that Good Samaritan is empowered to act
                    without any fear of adverse consequences or harassment.  Save life must be the
                    top priority.
                    4.     Several countries have enacted such laws.   In England and Wales, the
                    Parliament has enacted the Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Act 2015
                    which provides for certain factors to be considered by the Court while hearing
                    an action for negligence or breach of duty. Section 2 of the Act provides that
                    the Court must consider whether the respondent was acting for the benefit of
                                                                                                    Page 2
     	
